Updated August 27, 2026
Linden Avenue runs through Glendale's older apartment stock, and three of this desk's twelve Glendale closings sit on it — spread across eleven years at three different sizes.
| Closed | Building | Units | Price | Per unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2014 | 1036 Linden Ave | 6 | $1,325,000 | $220,833 |
| Aug 2023 | 1117-1119 Linden Ave | 17 | $6,100,000 | $358,824 |
| Dec 2025 | 1113 Linden Ave | 5 | $1,425,000 | $285,000 |
Every variable a comparable is meant to control for — city, neighborhood, street character, regulatory regime — is identical across these three. What differs is size, condition and time.
And what the column shows is a rise across eleven years, which is the least surprising thing on this page and the most useful. Two small buildings, nine years apart in time and 29% apart per door. A larger building in between at the top of the range.
Note what did not happen: the seventeen-unit building did not price below the small ones. In most submarkets covered here the size effect would push it down — West Hollywood's larger band prices 43% under its small band. Glendale's bands barely separate at all, and Linden Avenue is that pattern in miniature. See why Glendale prices so consistently.
1036 Linden closed in April 2014. The next Linden closing was August 2023. That nine-year interval is the same hole that runs through the whole Glendale record — the nine-year gap and what came after it.
It is also why the 2014 figure should be read as history rather than as a comparable. A per-door number from a street that then went quiet for nine years is not a current reference for anything.
The archive holds addresses, unit counts, prices and dates — not rent rolls, condition reports or construction years. So I will not attribute the differences between these three buildings to anything specific about them; the methodology sets out that limit.
What is true generally in Glendale, and could sit inside these gaps: how far in-place rents sat below market, what capital each building needed, and — because Glendale has no rent cap, only a relocation threshold above a 7% increase — how much of that below-market position a buyer believed they could act on quickly.
That last one is genuinely different from how the same question works in Los Angeles, and it is set out in what the 7% trigger actually costs.
The full Glendale record is at the closing record in full.
Request a free evaluation of your building →
Thinking about selling? Get a no-obligation evaluation on your building.
Request Free Evaluation →