Updated August 27, 2026
The most common apartment building in Hollywood is not the one on the postcards. It is the dingbat: a two-story wood-frame block, stucco-clad, raised on slender columns over open ground-floor parking, built at volume across Southern California through the 1950s and 1960s.
They solved two problems at once — housing a growing population, and parking the cars that population arrived with. They are also, structurally, the reason Los Angeles has a mandatory retrofit program.
Lifting the apartments over an open parking level removes the walls that would otherwise brace the ground floor. What is left is a soft story — a level significantly weaker than the ones above it. In a major earthquake the upper floors can move laterally over a ground floor that cannot resist them, and the building folds at that level. It happened at scale in the 1994 Northridge earthquake.
Los Angeles adopted Ordinance 183893 in January 2015 requiring these buildings to be retrofitted, and identified roughly 13,500 buildings across the city. Hollywood, being inside the City of Los Angeles and full of exactly this type, is squarely inside that program.
The mechanics of the ordinance, the deadlines and the disclosure obligations are covered in what the LA soft-story retrofit ordinance means when you sell. This page is about what it means for a Hollywood building specifically.
Three ways, and they interact.
As a completed cost. A finished retrofit with its paperwork in order removes the question from diligence. Buyers do not pay a premium for it in the way sellers hope, but they stop discounting for it — which on a building of this type is worth more than the premium would have been.
As an outstanding obligation. An unretrofitted building carries a known, dated cost that the buyer will price. The discount a buyer applies is reliably larger than the actual construction cost, because they are pricing the cost plus the uncertainty plus the disruption of doing the work while occupied.
As a financing condition. Lenders order a probable maximum loss assessment on Los Angeles multifamily, and a soft-story building without a completed retrofit reads differently on that report. Where that pushes a lender toward requiring earthquake coverage, it changes the buyer's operating numbers before they have opened a wall. See what a PML report is.
Not whether to retrofit — the ordinance answers that — but whether to complete it before selling or price the building with it outstanding. That is a real financial question with a real answer that depends on the building, and it is worked through in sell now versus complete the retrofit first.
The one position that reliably costs money is starting the work and selling mid-way. A half-finished retrofit gives a buyer every argument the unfinished version does, plus an open permit and a contractor relationship they did not choose.
Because the economics that built them still hold. A dingbat puts a lot of units on a small Hollywood lot, and Hollywood doors are not cheap: across the 24 buildings in my own closed record here the median is $282,589 per unit. Density on expensive land is what a buyer of this asset is actually buying.
They are also, almost without exception, pre-1978 — which means LA City rent stabilization applies and the buyer underwrites a capped rent trajectory. That is not a defect in the asset. It is the asset. Pricing one as though vacancy were achievable is the most expensive mistake available on this building type.
Request a free evaluation of your building →
Thinking about selling? Get a no-obligation evaluation on your building.
Request Free Evaluation →