Sell Now or Hold? The Sherman Oaks Question in 2026

Updated September 28, 2026

Written September 2026. A market view carries a date because it stops being true.

Sherman Oaks sits inside the City of Los Angeles, so every force acting on a City multifamily owner this year reaches you here. What makes Sherman Oaks a different conversation from Reseda or Panorama City is not the rulebook — it's that the same rulebook lands on the Valley's highest per-door pricing, which changes the size of every number in the decision.

The forces acting on your building

The RSO rewrite. From July 1, 2026, the LA City rent-stabilization formula runs at 90% of CPI with a 1% floor and a 4% ceiling, down from a looser pre-2026 formula. If your building is pre-1978 and your income depends on the annual increase rather than turnover, this is the force that changes your building's underwritten trajectory. Sherman Oaks has a deep, long-held pre-1978 stock, particularly north of Ventura Boulevard, so this reaches a large share of the submarket's inventory directly.

Insurance. Southern California multifamily renewals have run substantially higher over the past two years, with shorter perils lists and, for some owners, non-renewal outright. This hits net operating income directly regardless of jurisdiction, and buyers underwrite your next premium, not your last one.

The cost of debt. Also indifferent to city lines, and the primary reason per-door figures moved across every Los Angeles submarket between 2022 and 2024.

The soft-story retrofit. Much of the postwar walk-up stock north of Ventura — apartments over open ground-floor parking — is exactly what the LA retrofit ordinance targets. Complete, you pay the construction cost. Left undone, the buyer's discount for it reliably runs higher than the work itself, because they're pricing the expense, the schedule risk, and the uncertainty together.

Measure ULA — and it bites sooner here than almost anywhere else in the Valley. ULA is charged on the entire gross sale price of a City of Los Angeles building above $5,400,000, at 4%; above $10,900,000, at 5.5%, for sales closing after June 30, 2026. Sherman Oaks carries the highest per-door figures of any Valley submarket in this record, which means a Sherman Oaks building crosses the ULA threshold at a meaningfully lower unit count than the identical-sized building in Van Nuys or North Hollywood. Two owners with the same number of doors can be on opposite sides of that line purely because one owns in Sherman Oaks. Model it on the gross number before you set a price — see what it costs to sell a Sherman Oaks apartment building for the full sequence.

The divide inside the submarket itself

Sherman Oaks is not one product. South of Ventura Boulevard, the stock runs newer and better-positioned; north of it, older and more ordinary. Both halves carry the identical regulatory stack described above — the same RSO exposure, the same ULA threshold, the same retrofit ordinance — and they do not sell for the same price. A broker or a market report that quotes "Sherman Oaks pricing" as one number is averaging together two different products. Which side of the boulevard your building sits on is worth more to your outcome than almost any renovation you could make to it.

What the record actually shows

This desk has closed 17 Sherman Oaks buildings across fourteen years — 349 units, $96.2 million in aggregate — with closings in most years since 2012 and gaps in 2018, 2022, 2023 and 2025. That pattern is closer to steady than clustered: Sherman Oaks transacts in most conditions, which is consistent with a deep local operator buyer pool that doesn't wait for a particular market signal before it moves.

The most recent closing in the record, a 36-unit building at $12,100,000 in May 2026, sits comfortably above the ULA threshold on its own — a useful reminder that at Sherman Oaks price levels, ULA is not a hypothetical line item reserved for the largest buildings in the city. It is a standard part of the arithmetic on a mid-sized Sherman Oaks sale.

One entry in the record is worth pulling out on its own: 14258 Dickens Street, an 11-unit building, sold for $1,435,000 in April 2013 and sold again for $1,900,000 in February 2014 — the same address, the same eleven units, a 32% increase in under a year. Nothing about the building changed in those ten months. What changed was the buyer pool's appetite in the early recovery years after the last downturn, and it's the clearest single data point in this record that timing can move a Sherman Oaks price faster than any capital improvement would. It cuts the other way too: an owner who bought at the top of a run and needs to sell into a cooling one should expect the same mechanism working against them.

The question that actually decides it

Not "is 2026 a good year for Sherman Oaks." It's narrower than that: which side of Ventura is your building on, is your rent roll already close to the new ceiling or far below it, and have you modeled ULA on your actual gross number rather than an assumption?

An owner north of Ventura holding a pre-1978 building with rents well below market is the profile most exposed to the July 2026 formula change — the gap they've been sitting on just got harder to close, and buyers are pricing that in now rather than waiting for the ceiling to bite in practice. An owner south of Ventura with a newer, Costa-Hawkins exempt building is playing a different game entirely, one where AB 1482's looser statewide cap applies instead and the RSO rewrite is largely irrelevant to their income.

Hold if you're willing to operate the building, your loan doesn't punish an early exit, and you haven't yet captured the legal increases available to you. A well-run Sherman Oaks building, on either side of Ventura, remains a reasonable place to have capital — the deep local buyer pool here isn't going anywhere.

Sell if you're not the owner who wants to keep running it, or if your building sits at a size and price point where ULA is about to take a bite you haven't planned for. Model the gross number, know your side of the boulevard, and price on the regulatory reality rather than a memory of 2021.

If the numbers point to selling, how to sell an apartment building in Los Angeles walks through pricing, rent law, Measure ULA and the timeline from listing to close.

Request a free evaluation of your building →


Frequently asked questions

Does the 2026 RSO rewrite affect all Sherman Oaks buildings?
Only buildings built before October 1978 that are covered by LA City RSO. Post-1995 Costa-Hawkins exempt buildings are unaffected by the rewrite and fall under the separate, looser AB 1482 cap instead.

Why does Measure ULA matter more in Sherman Oaks than elsewhere in the Valley?
Because Sherman Oaks carries the highest per-door pricing of any Valley submarket this desk has closed in, a Sherman Oaks building reaches the ULA gross-price threshold at a lower unit count than an identically sized building in a lower-priced Valley submarket.

Is north or south of Ventura Boulevard a better place to own?
Neither is inherently better — they're different products with different buyer pools. South tends toward newer, better-located stock; north toward older, more ordinary inventory. Both carry the identical regulatory exposure.

Should I sell before or after the RSO rewrite fully takes effect?
If your building is pre-1978 and rent-controlled, buyers have already been repricing for the rewrite since it was approved — waiting does not restore the old formula. The building-specific question is whether your loan, your rent gap, and your own appetite to keep operating it point toward selling now or continuing to hold.


Michael Sterman is Senior Managing Director Investments at Marcus & Millichap, specializing in Los Angeles multifamily transactions across the San Fernando Valley.

Thinking about selling? Get a no-obligation evaluation on your building.

Request Free Evaluation →