Updated September 28, 2026
Every accepted offer on an LA apartment building gets renegotiated at least once. Not because the seller lied about anything, and not because the buyer is acting in bad faith — because inspection is the first time anyone has looked at the building's bones with a flashlight instead of a comp sheet. The question isn't whether a buyer comes back with a list. It's which items on that list are real leverage and which ones are a negotiating posture dressed up as a discovery.
I have watched sellers concede far more than a finding was actually worth, because nobody on their side of the table had seen enough inspection reports to know the difference between a real problem and an inflated one. I have also watched sellers dig in on a genuine structural finding and lose the buyer entirely. Both mistakes come from the same place: not knowing what's normal.
Your purchase agreement was priced on the information available before anyone walked the roof, the boiler room, and every unit interior. Inspection replaces assumptions with facts. Some of those facts confirm what everyone already suspected — the building is exactly as advertised. Some of them are genuinely new information: a roof with less remaining life than the age suggested, an electrical panel that doesn't match what's in the permit history, plumbing that's been patched instead of replaced.
The buyer's leverage at this stage comes entirely from their ability to walk, using their inspection contingency. Your leverage comes from the strength of your original marketing — if you ran a real process with multiple interested parties, you have somewhere else to go. If this buyer was your only bite, you have almost none, and that reality shapes how hard you can push back regardless of how reasonable your position is.
Genuinely new, material information. Something the buyer could not reasonably have anticipated from the marketing package and public records — a structural issue, active water intrusion, code items nobody disclosed. These findings justify a real conversation about price or credit. Don't fight these on principle. Fight them on the number.
Known conditions priced into the original offer. Building age, expected wear on original-vintage systems, cosmetic condition consistent with what photos and the marketing package already showed. A buyer re-raising something that was visible in due diligence materials before they wrote the offer is asking for a second discount on the same information. This is where sellers should hold firm.
Negotiating theater. A long list of minor items — a dripping faucet, a cracked tile, a light switch — bundled together to create the appearance of a bigger problem than exists. Individually these items cost hundreds of dollars. Presented as a page-long list, they're meant to feel like thousands. Price them individually and the leverage usually evaporates.
The mistake most sellers make is responding to all three buckets the same way — either capitulating across the board because the list looks long, or refusing everything on principle and risking the deal over items that genuinely matter. Who pays for repairs found in the buyer's inspection covers the mechanics of credits versus direct repairs; this is about the negotiation that decides which repairs even make it onto that list.
When a buyer's inspector flags something real, the dollar figure attached to it is often the inspector's estimate or the buyer's contractor's bid — both of which have an incentive to run high. Before agreeing to a credit, get your own estimate on the specific item. A lower estimate from a roofer or contractor you called yourself is a completely different negotiation than accepting the first number you're handed, and the gap between the two is frequently larger than sellers expect.
This isn't about being difficult. It's about recognizing that "the inspection found something" and "the inspection found something that costs what they say it costs" are two separate facts, and only the first one is usually true without verification.
These are not interchangeable, and which one you offer changes your outcome. A price reduction lowers your net proceeds by the full amount and closes the conversation. A credit at closing does the same thing financially but is sometimes easier to agree to quickly because it doesn't require reopening the purchase agreement's price term. A direct repair — you fix it before close — costs you time and coordination but sometimes costs less than what the buyer would have negotiated as a credit, because you're paying contractor rates instead of the inflated number in someone else's bid.
For a genuinely material finding, a credit is usually the fastest path to keeping the deal alive without a drawn-out dispute over your ability or willingness to complete repairs before closing. For a large-scope item — a roof, major plumbing, a soft-story retrofit gap — consider whether fixing it yourself before you ever list would have produced a better outcome than negotiating it after the fact. That's a question worth asking on your next building, even if it's too late for this one. The preparation stage that prevents most of these surprises in the first place is covered in how to sell an apartment building in Los Angeles.
If the building already carries known deferred maintenance that was disclosed and priced into the offer, expect the buyer's inspection to confirm rather than surprise. Selling with deferred maintenance covers how that gets handled before an offer is even accepted — which is the better outcome, because a disclosed, pre-priced issue has almost no renegotiation leverage attached to it at inspection. The issues that cost sellers money after inspection are almost always the ones that weren't disclosed clearly the first time, whether by omission or by genuine surprise.
What you were required to disclose upfront shapes what a buyer can credibly claim was a "surprise" at inspection. If an item should have appeared in your required disclosures and didn't, you have very little room to argue the finding isn't material — the omission itself becomes the issue, separate from the repair cost. Get your disclosure package right before you go to market and most of the theater-bucket findings never get real traction, because the buyer already had the information.
Once you and the buyer land on a number, the deal moves into the period between the revised agreement and the actual close — a stretch where new issues can still surface if the renegotiation reopened parts of due diligence. What happens between an accepted offer and closing covers that stretch in full, including how price renegotiations typically get documented and finalized before funds move.
Inspection renegotiation isn't a referendum on whether your building has problems — every building does. It's a test of whether you can tell the difference between a real finding and a negotiating tactic, and whether you have the marketing leverage to hold your ground on the difference. Sellers who ran a real process with real competition going into the offer keep more of their price at this stage than sellers who didn't, because the buyer knows there's somewhere else for you to go. That leverage was built weeks before inspection ever happened. By the time the report lands in your inbox, it's mostly too late to create it — only to use it.
Can a buyer walk away entirely because of inspection findings?
Yes, if they're still inside their inspection contingency period, a buyer can terminate for any material finding or, depending on the contract, for any reason at all while the contingency remains active.
How much should I expect to concede after inspection?
It depends entirely on what's found and how well the building was disclosed and marketed beforehand. A clean, well-disclosed building with a competitive original process often sees minimal renegotiation; a building with real surprises can see a meaningful credit.
Should I get my own inspection before listing to avoid this?
Many experienced LA sellers do exactly that. A pre-listing inspection lets you disclose known issues upfront, price them into your ask, and remove most of the negotiating room a buyer would otherwise have after their own inspection.
Does renegotiating after inspection always mean a lower price?
Not always. Some renegotiations end with a credit rather than a price change, and some end with the seller successfully holding the original number after providing their own documentation or estimate.
Michael Sterman is Senior Managing Director Investments at Marcus & Millichap, specializing in Los Angeles multifamily transactions.
Thinking about selling? Get a no-obligation evaluation on your building.
Request Free Evaluation →