The listing agreement is the only contract in the entire sale where you have all the leverage, and most sellers sign it in four minutes without reading it. After this document is signed, every other contract — the purchase agreement, the escrow instructions, the estoppels — is negotiated by your broker on your behalf. This one you negotiate against your broker. It defines who they represent, how long they control your building, what they get paid, and what happens if the deal you want comes from a buyer they never found. Spend an hour here and you protect everything downstream.
Exclusive right to sell. Your broker earns the commission no matter who finds the buyer — including a buyer who walks in off the street, including your cousin, including the tenant in unit 3. This is the standard on virtually every serious LA multifamily listing, and there's a defensible reason for it. A broker will only run a full marketing process — package, buyer outreach, qualifying, showings — when they know they can't be cut out at the closing table. The trade-off is real, though: you've handed one firm total control of the most valuable asset you own for the length of the term.
Exclusive agency. Your broker earns the commission only if they (or another broker) procure the buyer. If you find the buyer entirely on your own, you owe nothing. It sounds seller-friendly, and it almost never happens in LA multifamily, because brokers won't invest in marketing a building they might not get paid on. If a broker offers you exclusive agency, ask why — it usually means a thin process.
Open listing. Multiple brokers can bring buyers; whoever closes the deal gets paid; no one is committed to marketing. This is how rentals get listed, not how a multimillion-dollar building gets sold. An open listing on serious multifamily produces no real campaign and a fractured, leaderless transaction.
The honest version: exclusive right to sell is the right structure for almost every LA seller. The thing to watch isn't the structure — it's the term, the commission terms, and the carve-outs inside it.
The term is how long the broker controls your listing. Too short doesn't give a broker room to run a disciplined process — pricing, marketing, the inevitable repricing if the first buyer pool doesn't bite. Too long traps you with a broker who turns out to be wrong for the building. Watch for anything open-ended.
What you want is a defined term with a clean exit, tied to a plan. If a broker can't tell you what the listing looks like at day 30, day 60, and day 90 — and what triggers a repricing — the term length is the least of your problems. You're hiring the wrong broker. The questions that surface this are the same ones to ask before you sign, in how to choose a multifamily broker in Los Angeles.
The commission is negotiated here, not set by any schedule or regulation. On most LA multifamily deals the seller pays the total commission, and the listing broker allocates a share to the buyer's broker under the co-broker arrangement written into this document. The full mechanics live in how multifamily broker commissions work in LA; here's what to watch inside the agreement itself.
Read the co-broker split. A buyer's broker who knows a fair share is waiting brings their buyers to your building. A split quietly shaved to pad the listing side can cost you the most motivated buyer in the market — and you'll never see the buyer who didn't get shown your deal. The split is a marketing decision disguised as a math line.
The single most useful thing you can do: don't shop the commission rate as if it were the price of the building. A point saved on a poorly marketed listing is dwarfed by what a wider, better-run buyer process puts on the closing statement.
Near the end of the agreement is a clause that says: if you sell within some window after the listing ends, to a buyer the broker introduced during the term, you still owe the commission. This is the protection period (sometimes called the tail or holdover), and it exists for a fair reason — to stop a seller from firing the broker the day before signing with a buyer the broker spent three months cultivating.
The abuse to watch for is a long tail with a vague definition of who counts as a "procured" buyer. You don't want to owe a full commission two years later, to a broker you parted ways with, on a buyer who found you through an entirely different channel. Two protections make this fair: a named-buyer list — a written list of the buyers the broker actually introduced — and a clause that voids the tail if you re-list with another broker, so a second commission can't stack on the first.
If your listing broker also represents the buyer, that's dual agency, and California requires it to be disclosed and consented to in writing. It is legal, and it can produce the fastest, cleanest close on the table when a broker's existing buyer is the right buyer. But understand the tension honestly: a broker representing both sides cannot fully advocate for your price against their own buyer's price. That's not a character flaw — it's structural.
Watch for the agreement that pre-consents you to dual agency in the fine print at signing. You want the right to evaluate it deal-by-deal, when there's an actual buyer and an actual number — not a blanket waiver signed before any of that exists.
A handful of additions, written in before signing, that protect you without weakening the broker's incentive to work:
These don't make you a difficult client. They make you a seller a competent broker is happy to work with, because everything is clear before the pressure starts. The same clarity carries straight into how to sell a multifamily property in Los Angeles once the listing is live.
The listing agreement is the one moment in the sale when you're negotiating from full strength — before a buyer exists, before a clock is running, before anyone needs anything from you. Most sellers spend that leverage on nothing, then spend the next ninety days wishing they'd asked the question they didn't read. Read it like it's the contract that governs every contract after it. It is.
Request a free evaluation — including a plain-English walkthrough of every term before you sign anything →
Can I get out of a listing agreement if I change my mind?
It depends on the termination clause you negotiated. An agreement with a defined early-termination path is far easier to exit cleanly than one that's silent on the question — which is exactly why you negotiate it before signing, not after.
Does the listing agreement set the price?
No. It sets the engagement — broker, term, commission, and carve-outs. The price is a separate decision built from comparable closings and the buyer pool for your specific building.
What contingencies show up later, after a buyer signs?
Those live in the purchase contract, not the listing agreement. See what contingencies to expect in an LA apartment building purchase contract.
Michael Sterman is Senior Managing Director Investments at Marcus & Millichap. This is informational, not legal advice — have counsel review any listing agreement before you sign.
Thinking about selling? Get a no-obligation evaluation on your building.
Request Free Evaluation →