Most sellers arrive assuming the listing platform choice is administrative — list on Crexi, list on LoopNet, let the process run. It is not administrative. It is the single decision that most directly shapes which buyers you end up talking to, and which ones you don't. The right choice depends more on the building than on the market.
The building you most want to list publicly is often the one that sells best off-market. The building that feels like it should be marketed quietly is often the one that needs public visibility to find its true buyer. The instinct gets it backwards because sellers focus on exposure — the reasoning that "more eyeballs means more bids" — when the variable that actually matters is whether the optimal buyer for the building is findable through a broad listing process or through a targeted outreach.
Larger institutional-scale assets — generally $10M+ — benefit from public visibility. The buyer pool for a $15M multifamily deal includes dozens of institutional and private equity players who expect to see the listing on Crexi and in brokerage-circulated marketing materials. A quiet process on this asset class often suppresses bidding, not protects it. Physically and operationally clean buildings in active submarkets — Westside, Mid-City core, Warner Center corridor — also benefit from broad exposure. Competition among known institutional buyers drives pricing. When the seller does not have a specific preferred buyer type and wants maximum discovery, public listing serves that goal.
Smaller buildings in relationship-driven submarkets — Tarzana, Panorama City, Van Nuys, parts of Glendale and Burbank — often sell better off-market. The local operator who already owns three buildings within a mile is paying attention through a broker's relationship network, not through LoopNet scans. Public listing this building can actually widen the pool in the wrong direction. Buildings with sensitive tenant situations. Publicly listing a building with active tenant issues, in-progress buyouts, or contested occupancy sometimes degrades the negotiations with those tenants once they see the listing. An off-market process preserves optionality. Buildings whose story needs pre-transaction context. A building with deferred capital that the seller is disclosing upfront, a building with a complex ownership structure, a building where the right buyer is a specific type — these benefit from targeted introductions where the context lands with the conversation.
$5M–$10M assets in moderately-deep submarkets are the hardest call. Institutional interest is possible but not certain. Local operator interest is real. The right process depends on specific building characteristics, current buyer activity, and the seller's priorities on timing vs. price maximization. Hybrid processes often work best here: targeted pre-marketing to 4-6 specific buyers before public listing. Brief, disciplined, two-to-three-week window. If a clean offer comes in at the right price, transact. If not, launch publicly with more context than the seller would have had otherwise.
Public listing does: create price discovery through competitive bidding, attract institutional attention, signal seriousness to buyers who would not engage on a casual outreach, produce a defensible sale process for fiduciary-duty contexts. Public listing does not, by default: find the highest-possible buyer, protect against re-trades, produce a faster close than a relationship sale, guarantee anything beyond the quality of the marketing package.
Off-market does: surface the buyer most committed to the specific building, preserve seller optionality if early offers are not compelling, protect confidentiality, move faster with the right buyer, enable more candid price and terms conversations. Off-market does not, by default: produce the highest possible price, reach institutional buyers in all cases, replace the need for clean preparation, work for every building type.
The right process is building-specific. A broker who defaults to one process for every seller is optimizing for their own operations, not for the client's outcome. The honest conversation starts with the specific building, the specific submarket, and the specific buyer pool — and builds from there.
Request an evaluation — including a recommended process specific to your building →
Michael Sterman is Senior Managing Director Investments at Marcus & Millichap.
Thinking about selling? Get a no-obligation evaluation on your building.
Request Free Evaluation →