Updated August 27, 2026
The 1994 Northridge earthquake struck at 4:31 a.m. on 17 January at magnitude 6.7. Its epicenter was inside Reseda — between Arminta and Ingomar streets, just west of Reseda Boulevard.
The earthquake carries a different neighborhood's name. The ground it started under is this one.
Because of what stands above it. Reseda's apartment stock is overwhelmingly postwar — large garden and courtyard buildings from the 1950s through the 1970s, a great many of them wood-frame with apartments raised over open ground-floor parking.
That configuration is a soft story: a ground floor with too few shear walls to brace the floors above. In a major earthquake the upper floors can move laterally over a ground floor that cannot resist them. It happened at scale in 1994.
Los Angeles adopted Ordinance 183893 in January 2015 requiring these buildings to be retrofitted, and identified roughly 13,500 across the city. Reseda, being inside the City of Los Angeles and full of exactly this type at exactly this scale, holds a great many of them.
Three ways, and on a large Reseda building all three are large numbers.
As a completed cost. A finished retrofit with clean paperwork does not earn a premium so much as remove a discount — which on a sixty-unit building is worth more than the premium would have been.
As an outstanding obligation. Buyers discount by reliably more than the work costs, because they price the construction plus the uncertainty plus doing it with tenants in place. At Reseda building sizes that discount is substantial.
As a financing condition. Lenders order a probable maximum loss assessment on Los Angeles multifamily, and a soft-story building without a completed retrofit reads differently on that report. Where it pushes a lender toward requiring earthquake coverage, it changes the buyer's operating numbers before they open a wall. See what a PML report is.
I am not going to tell you a Reseda building is more likely to be damaged in the next earthquake because the last one started here. Seismic risk does not work that way, and implying it would be scaremongering dressed as expertise.
What is true is narrower and more useful: the 1994 event demonstrated what this specific building type does under this specific kind of shaking, that demonstration is why the retrofit ordinance exists, and Reseda's stock is disproportionately that type at disproportionately large scale.
So the retrofit question is not one item on a diligence list here. It is close to the first question a buyer asks.
Establish the position with documentation before listing — permit status, engineering scope, and a real cost if the work is outstanding.
Then decide whether to complete it or price for it. That is a genuine financial question with a real answer, and it depends on your timeline and on which buyer you are selling to. The reasoning is in sell now versus complete the retrofit first.
The one position that reliably costs money is starting the work and selling part-way through it.
Request a free evaluation of your building →
Thinking about selling? Get a no-obligation evaluation on your building.
Request Free Evaluation →