Updated September 28, 2026
Yes, but you can't just pay off "your share" and walk. Cross-collateralization means one loan is secured by more than one property, often as a package a lender offered when an owner refinanced several buildings together. Selling one of those buildings means dealing with the entire loan, not a proportional slice of it, and that surprises more owners than it should given how common this structure is among LA landlords who built a portfolio over decades.
I see this most often with owners who bought several smaller buildings in the same era, refinanced them together for a better blended rate at some point, and haven't thought about the loan structure since. It's invisible until the day you want to sell just one.
From the lender's side, cross-collateralization spreads risk across multiple properties instead of concentrating it in one. If one building underperforms, the others in the pool support the loan. It also frequently gets a portfolio owner a better rate or higher leverage than financing each property separately would have allowed. The tradeoff, which most owners don't fully register at the time, is that the properties are now legally tied together until the lender agrees otherwise.
Payoff and release. You pay off the entire loan balance, not a per-property share, and the lender releases all the properties from the lien. This is the cleanest option if you're selling everything anyway, or if you have the liquidity to retire the full balance and keep the remaining buildings unencumbered or refinance them separately afterward.
Partial release. Many cross-collateralized loans include a partial release provision, letting you sell one property and pay down the loan by an agreed amount tied to that property's value, while the rest stay pledged against the remaining balance. Not every loan includes this option, and the ones that do often set conditions — like a minimum debt service coverage ratio on what's left after the release — so read the actual loan documents rather than assume.
Lender negotiation. If your loan doesn't have a clean partial release clause, you can still ask. Lenders sometimes agree to a negotiated release, particularly if the remaining properties comfortably support the loan on their own after one is sold, or if paying down principal from the sale proceeds improves the lender's position. This isn't guaranteed, and it takes lead time — start the conversation with your lender well before you go to market, not after you have a buyer waiting.
Buyers and their lenders will want clean title at close, which means whichever release path you take has to be resolved before or simultaneously with your closing. This is not something you can leave until the week before escrow closes. Loop in your lender the moment you decide to sell, get the partial release terms or payoff figure in writing, and build that timeline into your marketing schedule. A buyer who finds out mid-escrow that your title isn't cleanly releasable will either walk or demand an extension, and neither outcome helps your price.
It's also worth disclosing the cross-collateralization to serious buyers earlier rather than later, even though it's your financing problem and not theirs directly — a buyer who learns about a complicated release process for the first time during escrow tends to get nervous about what else they don't know, and that hesitation shows up in how aggressively they negotiate everything else.
Cross-collateralization is about your own existing debt, not about what you offer a buyer. Seller financing is a structure where you become the buyer's lender after the sale. Buying with assumable debt covers the separate question of whether a buyer takes over your existing loan instead of originating new financing. A cross-collateralized loan is neither of those — it's a constraint on your ability to deliver clean title on the property you're selling, and it has to be resolved before either of those other conversations even becomes relevant. If you're also unsure what your net proceeds look like after payoff, what happens to my mortgage when I sell walks through the general payoff mechanics that apply here too, layered on top of the multi-property complication.
A cross-collateralized loan doesn't prevent you from selling one building out of a pool — it just means the path to clean title runs through your lender first, not through the closing table. Owners who read their loan documents early, confirm whether a partial release provision exists, and start the lender conversation before marketing tend to close on schedule. Owners who discover the structure exists only when a buyer's title company flags it lose weeks they didn't budget for. The general framework for pricing and marketing the sale itself, once the loan question is resolved, is in how to sell an apartment building in Los Angeles.
Do all cross-collateralized loans allow a partial release?
No. Some do and some don't — it depends entirely on how the loan was structured. Read the actual loan documents, or ask your lender directly, rather than assuming one way or the other.
Will a cross-collateralized loan slow down my sale?
It can, if the release process isn't started early. Confirm your options with your lender before you list, so the release timeline runs parallel to your marketing period rather than starting after you already have a buyer.
Should I refinance out of a cross-collateralized loan before selling?
Sometimes, if the remaining properties can support their own financing independently and the numbers pencil. It depends on your specific loan terms, remaining balance, and how soon you plan to sell — worth modeling both paths with your lender before deciding.
Michael Sterman is Senior Managing Director Investments at Marcus & Millichap.
Thinking about selling? Get a no-obligation evaluation on your building.
Request Free Evaluation →