Updated August 17, 2026
7 units in Palms. Sold 25 March 2020 for $2,800,000. Sold again 16 October 2020 for $2,700,000. Two hundred and five days apart, one hundred thousand dollars lower.
Brokers publish the deals that went up. This one did not, and it is the more useful story — because the dates bracket the exact moment the Los Angeles market stopped, and because it shows what a seven-month hold looks like when the thing that changed was not the building.
25 March 2020 was ten days after California's first stay-at-home order. That closing was negotiated in a pre-pandemic market and funded into a market that no longer existed.
16 October 2020 was into a market with no answer yet on whether tenants would pay rent, whether eviction moratoria would extend indefinitely, or what an LA rent roll was worth when collection had become uncertain.
Nothing about the building changed between those dates. Seven units, same location, same street. The change was entirely in what a buyer would underwrite.
A hundred thousand dollars on $2.8 million is 3.6%. Held over 205 days.
That is worth sitting with, because in the spring of 2020 the range of things people were saying about LA multifamily included outcomes far worse than a 3.6% adjustment. The asset class held up better than the commentary did.
It also, on any honest accounting, cost the seller more than 3.6%. Transaction costs on both ends — commission, escrow, title, transfer taxes — plus seven months of carry, on a building bought at the top of a market and sold into the trough of a shock. The headline is the smaller part of the number.
A short hold is the most expensive thing you can do. The transaction costs of buying and selling are close to fixed. Spread across seven months they are punishing; spread across seven years they disappear into the appreciation. Nothing about the strategy here was wrong — the timing was simply unlucky, and short holds have no cushion for luck.
The market repriced before the fundamentals did. Rents in Palms did not fall 3.6% in that window. Buyer confidence did. Price is set by what buyers will underwrite, and in a shock that moves faster and further than the underlying income.
Small buildings move with sentiment more than large ones. A seven-unit building is bought largely by private buyers making a personal decision, and personal decisions are sentiment-sensitive. Institutional capital underwrites through a shock; individuals wait it out.
It is not evidence that LA multifamily is risky in the way the number suggests. A 3.6% adjustment through the sharpest economic stop in living memory is, in context, remarkable stability. The same archive contains a 72-unit Reseda building bought in 2015 and resold in 2021 for $4.2 million more.
It is not a story about a bad building. Palms is a genuine Westside submarket with real demand and consistent occupancy. The building did what it was supposed to. The calendar did not.
It is not an argument for market timing. Nobody sitting in early 2020 knew what March would bring. Anyone claiming they can call the next one is selling something.
Two reasons, and the second matters more.
The first is that a track record with no down transactions is not a track record, it is a marketing document. Two hundred and fifty-nine closings over fourteen years across three cycles will contain trades that went the wrong way, and a seller deciding who to trust should be able to see them.
The second is that this is the transaction most relevant to a specific kind of owner: someone who bought recently, is thinking about selling soon, and has not modeled what a short hold actually costs after transaction costs. That owner will not learn anything from a deal that doubled over a decade. They will learn something here.
An owner in a comparable position today faces a different set of pressures than the 2020 seller did.
Insurance has repriced across the county since the January 2025 fires — an expense line that did not move in 2020 and moves materially now.
The RSO rewrite took effect in July 2026, capping LA City increases at a 4% ceiling rather than the old 8%. That constrains the long-run rent trajectory buyers underwrite.
Measure ULA did not exist in 2020. At $2.8 million this building would still sit below the current threshold — but any owner contemplating a short hold on a larger asset now has a transfer tax of 4% or 5.5% of gross price on the exit, which makes a short hold considerably more expensive than it was.
A building sold twice in one year and lost a hundred thousand dollars, and the honest lesson is not about the market — it is about duration. Los Angeles multifamily rewards holding. The transaction costs are fixed, the appreciation is not, and the shortest holds are where the arithmetic is least forgiving. If you are weighing a sale within a couple of years of buying, model the full round-trip cost before the market gets a vote.
Thinking about selling? Get a no-obligation evaluation on your building.
Request Free Evaluation →