Updated August 16, 2026
Most LA sellers arrive at the exchange decision having thought hard about the sale and almost not at all about what comes next. Then the 45-day identification clock starts, and a decision that deserved three months gets made in three weeks. The two real destinations are more apartments — usually somewhere cheaper and less regulated than Los Angeles — or a net-leased commercial property where a corporate tenant pays the rent, handles the building, and sends a cheque.
I have closed both sides of this. On the replacement side that has meant net-leased assets in eight states — 7-Eleven, Walgreens, Walmart, Wendy's, Panera, Sherwin-Williams, Aldi — for LA owners who were done being landlords. It is not a theoretical comparison for me, and the honest version of it is that neither destination is better. They solve different problems, and the wrong one is usually chosen for the right-sounding reason.
Sellers frame this as a yield question. It almost never is.
The real question is what you want your next ten years to look like. An LA apartment building has been a job: rent collection, RSO registration, retrofit deadlines, LAHD notices, turnover, a manager to supervise, an insurance renewal that now moves in unpleasant directions. Some owners are exiting the asset. Others are exiting the job.
If you are exiting the asset but not the job, more apartments is usually right. If you are exiting the job, net lease is the honest answer, and buying more apartments in Texas because the cap rate looked better is how owners end up doing the same work from further away.
A corporate tenant on a long lease. Ten to twenty years is typical, often with renewal options, frequently with a corporate guarantee behind it.
Almost no management. In a true triple-net structure the tenant carries taxes, insurance and maintenance. The owner's job is depositing rent and monitoring the lease.
Predictable, contractual income. Rent bumps are written into the lease rather than negotiated, capped by ordinance, or dependent on turnover.
No tenant protections in the residential sense. No RSO, no just-cause, no relocation schedule, no rent registry. A commercial tenant is a contracting party, not a protected class.
Financeability. Lenders understand credit-tenant assets, and the debt is generally straightforward.
Rent growth is contractual, not market. Your upside is what the lease says — often 1.5% to 2% a year, or a step every five years. In a strong market you do not participate. The enormous below-market-to-market gap that makes an LA rent-controlled building interesting simply does not exist here.
Credit risk replaces tenant risk. You are not underwriting twelve households, you are underwriting one company. If that tenant fails or does not renew, income does not decline — it stops.
Residual value is the whole game. At lease end you own a special-purpose building in a market you may not know. A drugstore box in a town you have never visited is worth what the next tenant will pay, and that is a harder number to forecast than an apartment building's.
Illiquidity and geography. These trade nationally, priced off credit and lease term. Yours is likely to be far from Los Angeles.
Rent growth you participate in. Especially outside California's regulatory regimes, where turnover is faster and increases are not capped.
An asset class you already understand. You have run apartment buildings. You know what a bad roof costs and what a slow turn looks like.
Depreciation and a familiar tax profile. Residential depreciates over a shorter schedule than commercial, which matters to after-tax cash flow.
Multiple tenants. One vacancy is a dent, not a stoppage.
It is still a job, and often a harder one at distance. Out-of-state ownership means either a management company you cannot supervise closely or trips you did not plan on.
New regulatory learning. Every state and city has its own rules. Owners who leave LA to escape regulation sometimes discover the replacement market has plenty of its own.
Concentration in a market you don't know. Your LA knowledge — which streets, which vintage, which buyer — does not transfer.
Forty-five days to identify, 180 to close, and the clock starts at your sale's closing, not when you feel ready.
That pressure systematically favours net lease, because net-leased assets are a national, liquid, brokered market where you can identify a credit-tenant property in a fortnight. Assembling conviction about apartment buildings in an unfamiliar city in the same window is genuinely hard, and sellers who try it often end up buying the least-bad option they could get under contract in time.
The fix is not to decide faster. It is to start the replacement search before you list. Every seller I have watched do this well had their replacement thesis formed while the LA building was still being marketed.
You do not have to choose one destination. A single LA sale can be exchanged into more than one replacement property, and splitting between a net-leased asset for stability and an apartment building for growth is entirely ordinary. It requires the identification rules to be handled properly, and it requires deciding early enough to line both up — but it resolves the "I want income and I want upside" tension that makes so many sellers stall.
A Delaware Statutory Trust can also absorb a remainder that would otherwise become taxable boot, which is worth knowing before you find yourself a few hundred thousand dollars short of full reinvestment.
I ask three questions before anyone mentions a cap rate.
Do you want to be a landlord in five years? If the answer is no, that settles most of it, and the remaining work is finding the right credit and lease term rather than the highest yield.
What happens to this asset when you die? If it is going to heirs who will sell it, the step-up largely resolves the income tax and the replacement should be chosen for ease of administration. If heirs will operate it, that is a different asset.
Have you started looking yet? If the building is listed and the answer is no, we have a timeline problem, and I would rather solve it now than watch the identification window make the decision.
Then we run the actual numbers: after-tax proceeds, the debt you have to replace to avoid boot, the realistic yield on each destination, and what each one demands of you weekly.
The sellers who do this well are the ones who decided what they wanted before the market decided for them.
Thinking about selling? Get a no-obligation evaluation on your building.
Request Free Evaluation →